All use cases
Live demonstration · Government
An AI recommended cutting benefits. A person owns the due-process call.
An AI eligibility system recommended terminating a household’s benefits. But an adverse determination creates due-process exposure — an authorized adjudicator must own it.
⊞
State Benefits Agency
Public benefits · eligibility
An AI eligibility system reviewed a household’s case and recommends terminating their assistance benefits.
An adverse determination triggers due-process protections and appeal rights. An authorized adjudicator must own the decision and the notice.
AI eligibility system · recommendationCASE-66120 — Continued eligibility
Reported income change exceeds threshold
Notice and appeal rights must be issued
Model recommends: TERMINATEAdverse determination requires an adjudicator
Make the call — and sign
You'll be asked for a device passkey, such as Touch ID — that's how we prove a real person signed.
Why a human must sign: Wrongful denials create due-process exposure and appeals — an authorized adjudicator must own every adverse determination.